The minimal facts for the resurrection: why a skeptic doesn’t believe the following is an excerpt from my critical review of rick broocks’ man, myth, messiah: answering history’s greatest question . Biblical and extra-biblical evidences which he calls the “minimal facts”: jesus died by crucifixion “the minimal facts approach to the resurrection of . In this essay, i will concentrate on the nature, distinctiveness, and value of the minimal facts methodological approach to the resurrection of jesus after a brief overview, i will interact directly with the use of such an approach by michael licona in his recent volume, the resurrection of jesus: a new historiographical approach , 1 including . 10 reasons to accept the resurrection of jesus as a fact minimal facts concerning the resurrection the resurrection of jesus thinking about the methods of .
One may find it even more surprising that there is a general consensus among said scholars concerning the resurrection of jesus of nazareth gary habermas and mike licona have presented what they term the “ minimal facts approach” (habermas & licona 2004, 46). Review of “the case for the resurrection of jesus” by habermas and licona, introduction to part 2: the minimal facts approach march 5, 2017 march 5, 2017 gary “when discussing the evidence for the resurrection, let’s stick to the topic of jesus’ resurrection. 12 historical facts about the resurrection of jesus most scholars agree upon habermas explains that the minimal facts method “considers the minimal facts .
Defending the resurrection of jesus in everyday conversations in this accessible apologetics video, i train christians to defend the resurrection of jesus in everyday conversations, focusing on the “minimal facts” approach i learned from dr gary habermas. The world’s leading expert on the resurrection of christ has created an entire course just for you distinguished research professor of apologetics and philosophy at liberty university, dr gary habermas, is one of the most respected scholars on the resurrection of jesus and in this course, he'll teach you everything he’s learned. If to you that’s a familiar situation, chances are you were indeed hearing the so-called “minimal facts” argument for jesus’s resurrection, whether the actual phrase “minimal facts” itself came up or not.
If we begin with a minimal list of evidences related to the resurrection of jesus (jesus died on the cross and was buried, jesus’s tomb was empty and no one ever produced his body, jesus’s disciples believed that they saw jesus resurrected from the dead, and jesus’s disciples were transformed following their alleged resurrection . Similarly, even if one were to grant, at least arguendo, that the hypothesis of jesus’ resurrection by yahweh is the best explanation of his gerrymandered “minimal facts”, it’s not obviously the best explanation given all the relevant data so, for example, suppose we throw in the “consensus” facts that, say, jesus falsely predicted . They then present five “minimal facts” of the resurrection: jesus died by crucifixion, his disciples believed in his resurrection and appearances, paul’s life was changed from persecutor to apostle, the skeptic james was converted, and the tomb is empty.
Is believing in the resurrection of jesus as foolish as falling for somebody’s tall-tale about teleportation recently james east brought to my attention his short article where he calls into question the “minimal facts” approach to arguing for the resurrection of jesus of nazareth. The resurrection of jesus has 186 ratings and 30 reviews tim said: i had been looking forward to reading this book since the first time i heard about it. Surprising scholarly agreement on facts that support jesus’ resurrection a minimal historical facts argument for jesus' resurrection. Resurrection chat: minimal facts with kids i saw reese’s peanut butter eggs on the supermarket shelf this week, and it can mean only one thing: easter approaches granted, its approach is heralded really early this year, but it’s never too early to discuss the resurrection of jesus with our kids.
In this interview with staff apologist jacob daniel (apologeticscom), world-renowned scholar and authority dr gary habermas presents his 'minimal facts' approach for the resurrection of jesus . The minimal facts approach is an approach to establishing the truth of jesus’ resurrection using two criteria (1) they must be facts that have a lot of evidence in their favor, and (2) these facts must be universally or nearly universally agreed upon by scholars and historians who study the subject, even the skeptical ones. The case for the resurrection of jesus has 562 ratings and 44 reviews j said: good book that discusses the minimal facts and evidences related to the r.